Nuevo marco de IA que optimiza autónomamente datos de entrenamiento, arquitecturas y algoritmos — superando estándares humanos
AI R&D runs on a cycle of hypothesis, experiment, and analysis — each step demanding substantial manual engineering effort. A new framework from researchers at SII-GAIR aims to close that bottleneck by automating the full optimization loop for training data, model architectures, and learning algorithms. A new framework called ASI-EVOLVE , developed by researchers at the Generative Artificial Intelligence Research Lab (SII-GAIR), aims to solve this bottleneck. Designed as an agentic system for AI-for-AI research, it uses a continuous "learn-design-experiment-analyze" cycle to automate the optimization of the foundational AI stack. In experiments, this self-improvement loop autonomously discovered novel designs that significantly outperformed state-of-the-art human baselines. The system generated novel language model architectures, improved pretraining data pipelines to boost benchmark scores by over 18 points, and designed highly efficient reinforcement learning algorithms. For enterprise teams running repeated optimization cycles on their AI systems, the framework offers a path to reducing manual engineering overhead while matching or exceeding the performance of human-designed baselines. The data and design bottleneck Engineering teams can only explore a tiny fraction of the vast possible design space for AI models at any given time. Executing experimental workflows requires costly manual effort and frequent human intervention. And the insights gained from these expensive cycles are often siloed as individual intuition or experience, making it difficult to systematically preserve and transfer that knowledge to future projects or across different teams. These constraints fundamentally limit the pace and scale of AI innovation. AI has made incredible strides in scientific discovery, ranging from specialized tools like AlphaFold solving discrete biological problems to agentic systems answering basic scientific questions. However, current frameworks still struggle with open-ended AI innovation and are mostly limited to narrow optimization within very specific constraints. Advancing core AI capabilities is far more complex. It requires modifying large interdependent codebases, running compute-heavy experiments that consume tens to hundreds of GPU hours, and analyzing multi-dimensional feedback from training dynamics. “Existing frameworks have not yet demonstrated that AI can operate effectively in this regime in a unified way, nor that it can generate meaningful advances across the three foundational pillars of AI development rather than within a single narrowly scoped setting,” the researchers write. How ASI-EVOLVE learns to research To overcome the limitations of manual R&D, ASI-EVOLVE operates on a continuous loop between prior knowledge, hypothesis generation, experimentation, and refinement. The system learns relevant knowledge and historical experience from existing databases, designs a candidate program representing its next hypothesis, runs experiments to obtain evaluation signals, and analyzes outcomes into reusable, human-readable lessons that it feeds back into its knowledge base. There are two key components that drive ASI-EVOLVE. The “Cognition Base” acts as the system's foundational domain expertise. To speed up the search process, the system is pre-loaded with human knowledge, task-relevant heuristics, and known pitfalls extracted from existing literature. This steers the exploration toward promising directions right from the first iteration. The second component is the “Analyzer,” which tackles the complex, multi-dimensional feedback from the experiments. It processes raw training logs, benchmark results, and efficiency traces, distilling them into compact, actionable insights and causal analyses. Several other complementary modules bring the framework together. A “Researcher” agent reviews prior knowledge from the cognition base and past experimental results to generate new hypotheses, either proposing locali…