All ideas/devtools/Una plataforma que automatice el modelado de costos de infraestructura SaaS con proyecciones TCO, análisis costo-por-tenant y optimización de precios.

GitHubB2Bdevtools

Una plataforma que automatice el modelado de costos de infraestructura SaaS con proyecciones TCO, análisis costo-por-tenant y optimización de precios.

Scouted 5 hours ago

7.3/ 10

Overall score

Turn this signal into an edge

We help you build it, validate it, and get there first.

Go from idea to plan: who buys, what MVP to launch, how to validate it, and what to measure before spending months.

Extra context

Learn more about this idea

Get a clearer explanation of what the opportunity means, the current problem behind it, how this idea solves it, and the key concepts involved.

Score breakdown

Urgency8.0

Market size8.0

Feasibility7.0

Competition6.0

Pain point

Las empresas SaaS necesitan modelar costos de infraestructura para validar precios y planificar capacidad, pero lo hacen manualmente.

Who'd pay for this

Equipos de ingeniería, finanzas y product management de empresas SaaS

Source signal

"explicit cost modeling is needed to validate plan pricing and capacity planning"

Original post

docs(cost): add hosting & cost plan

Repository: wegofwd2020-hub/thittam Author: wegofwd2020-hub ### What's needed A dedicated hosting & cost planning document in `thittam_docs`, parallel to StudyBuddy's `COST_PLAN.md`. Target location: `docs/operations/cost-plan.md`. Contents: - Per-environment infrastructure cost estimates (dev, staging, prod) - Cost per tenant at different scale tiers (10, 100, 1000 tenants) - Annual TCO projection for year-1 and year-3 - Cost breakdowns by component (compute, DB, egress, observability, SaaS) - Cost-vs-revenue analysis per subscription plan ### Why this gap exists / why it matters StudyBuddy maintains a detailed `COST_PLAN.md` that informs pricing, hosting decisions, and investor conversations. Thittam has no equivalent — infrastructure cost decisions have been made informally. As the platform scales past early adopters, explicit cost modeling is needed to validate plan pricing and capacity planning. Tied to upcoming hosting decisions (unblocks billing plan tuning). ### Acceptance criteria - [ ] Cost-per-tenant modeled at 10, 100, 1000 tenants - [ ] Each service's steady-state and peak resource footprint documented - [ ] External SaaS costs (NATS cloud, Vault cloud, CI minutes) itemized - [ ] Cross-referenced from ADR-006 (container orchestration) and `docs/deployment/kubernetes.md` - [ ] File lives at `thittam_docs/docs/operations/cost-plan.md`

View on github ↗